<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>this oughta be interesting... &#187; tests</title>
	<atom:link href="http://joshsharpe.com/archives/category/tests/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://joshsharpe.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 17:41:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>coverage testing</title>
		<link>http://joshsharpe.com/archives/coverage-testing</link>
		<comments>http://joshsharpe.com/archives/coverage-testing#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 01:18:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[tests]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joshsharpe.com/?p=7</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s a little bit of rcov love to ensure that your test suites are covering what they should be.
http://gist.github.com/206379
This should give you:

rake test:rcov
rake test:rcov:units
rake test:rcov:functionals
rake test:rcov:helpers

&#8230;with a tailored coverage report for each.
Hopefully this can give you a better idea of where your tests are lacking.  As it turns out, despite my app having coverage [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a little bit of rcov love to ensure that your test suites are covering what they should be.</p>
<p><a href="http://gist.github.com/206379">http://gist.github.com/206379</a></p>
<p>This should give you:</p>
<pre>
rake test:rcov
rake test:rcov:units
rake test:rcov:functionals
rake test:rcov:helpers
</pre>
<p>&#8230;with a tailored coverage report for each.</p>
<p>Hopefully this can give you a better idea of where your tests are lacking.  As it turns out, despite my app having coverage of 96%, my unit tests only cover 86% of my models.  I guess that means I have a bit of work to do.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s some app-specific stuff in EXCLUDED_FILES but the rest should be relatively application agnostic.</p>
<p>Enjoy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://joshsharpe.com/archives/coverage-testing/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
